Monday, March 30, 2009

jrwivhjnegswildshfiuwasdghfuwiocbdwlfhuewiulso stress.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Just spent countless hours on a report I severely underestimated. Sure the instructions were short and simple. But I just HAD to extend it and go into so much damn detail. Well there goes my weekend.

What was meant to be a simple 3-4 page report mutated into a 10 page; 2764 word wall of text.

Ah well.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Zzz...

Well that was short-lived. Lost motivation to update now :D

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Drug Receptor Interactions

Pharmacodynamics - what the drug does to the body
Pharmacokinetics - what the body does to the drug

Pharmacokinetics follows the ADME scheme;
  • Absorption
  • Distribution
  • Metabolism
  • Excretion
Definitions

KD = dissociation constant. Measures ability for an object to dissociate into smaller objects.

Clark's Model
  • Magnitude of response in proportional to drug-receptor (DR) complex
=> maximal response occurs when all receptors are occupied

EC50
  • Concentration of agonist that produces a response which is 50% of its maximum
  • Measure of agonist potency
  • pD2 = -logEC50
Affinity
  • Ability of a drug or ligand to bind to a receptor site
Efficacy
  • Ability of a drug or ligand to generate a response once bound to a receptor
Potency
  • Dose or concentration at which a drug produces an effect

Molecular targets for drug actions

Receptors
  • Nicotinic / muscarinic receptors
Ion channels
  • Ca2+ channels
  • Na+ channels
Enzymes
  • Acetylcholinesterase
Carrier proteins
  • Noradrenaline transporters

Antagonism

Competitive
  • Occupies receptor site but generates no response
  • No depression of maximum
  • Parallel shifts rightwards
  • Reversible
Non-competitive
  • Covalently binds to receptor site
  • Depression of maximum at high concentrations
  • Irreversible
  • i.e. Phenoxybenzamine (PBZ)
Schild Plot
  • Tests for competitive antagonism
  • Linear plot = competitive
pA2
  • Negative log10 of the antagonist concentration by which it is necessary to double the antagonist concentration to produce the same response as was obtained in the absence of the antagonist
  • Only relevant when antagonist is competitive
  • Compares relative potency of two competitive antagonists
  • pA2 increases = decrease in the concentration of antagonist required to shift the concentration-response curve ( = more potent the antagonist)

Friday, March 20, 2009

Introduction

As you can see, this blog is relatively empty. Over the next few days (....or weeks), I'll post text-only summaries for topics covered in PHA3011 (Principles of Drug Action). Don't ask why :)